
Ashcroft Defends Waterboarding Before House Panel
The controversial interrogation technique of waterboarding has served a "valuable" purpose and does not constitute torture, says former Attorney General John Ashcroft. Testifying on the Bush administration's interrogation rules before the House, Ashcroft said, the "value of the information received from the use of enhanced interrogation techniques — I don't know whether [Tenet] was saying waterboarding or not, but assume that he was for a moment — the value of that information exceeded the value of information that was received from all other sources."
4 comments

The August issue of Vanity Fair is set to clear up an important question once and for all: is waterboarding torture? No scientists or military experts were needed for this: just a self-proclaimed "wheezing, paunchy" 59-year-old scribbler. Christopher Hitchens, VF columnist and
controversial panelist extraordinaire, who's
written previously on the difference between "extreme interrogation" and "outright torture," submitted himself to the technique to make the call.

Col. Morris D. Davis, the US military's former chief prosecutor at Guantanamo Bay,
testified yesterday that top Pentagon officials interfered with his work for political reasons, and told him that there could be no detainee acquittals.