<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>CitizenSugar --  Breaking News, Together.</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/</link>
 <description>Breaking News, Together.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Vatican Opposes Decriminalization of Homosexuality? </title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/2558256</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/49_2008/f00563fc16abb629_Pope.xlarger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right xlarger&quot; width=&quot;268&quot; height=&quot;400&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;The United Nations is set to vote on a resolution that would call on all governments to decriminalize homosexuality. Yet almost 80 states that still criminalize homosexuality, as well as the Vatican, &lt;a href=&quot;http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnL2243948.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;oppose the measure proposed by the European Union&lt;/a&gt;. Specifically the resolution would condemn the jailing and execution those found guilty of homosexuality, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1117672&quot; &gt;which happens in countries like Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Vatican argues that while the teachings of the Church forbid unjust discrimination, a UN resolution &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5268745.ece&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;would put pressure on countries that do not recognize same-sex marriage&lt;/a&gt;. Still regardless of concerns about gay marriage, there may be good reason to pass the resolution — &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1859663&quot; &gt;decriminalizing homosexuality would help fights AIDS&lt;/a&gt; by bringing treatment and prevention programs into the mainstream. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Are you surprised the Vatican would come out against this UN resolution? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/2558256#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Catholic Church">Catholic Church</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/European Union">European Union</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Headline">Headline</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Homosexuality">Homosexuality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Same-Sex Marriage">Same-Sex Marriage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Vatican">Vatican</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:30:42 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2558256</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Vatican Installs Solar Panels On Roof</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/2120449</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/29/vatican-installs-solar-pa_n_130391.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Vatican Installs Solar Panels on Roof&lt;/a&gt;  The first solar panels were installed Monday on top of the papal audience hall at Vatican City. Workers began putting photovoltaic cells on the roof of the hall to convert sunlight into electricity. In sunny Rome, engineers say the cells will produce enough electricity to illuminate, heat, or cool the hall.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/2120449#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Eco">Eco</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/The Daily Planet">The Daily Planet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Vatican">Vatican</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/World of Faith">World of Faith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:40:22 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2120449</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Vatican Says Female Anglican Bishops Reveal a Divine Divide</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1767635</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/28_2008/81203619.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;380&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt; The Roman Catholic Church has signaled the start of Schism 2.0 (at least), thanks to the Church of England&#039;s decision to allow &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1766023&quot; &gt;women bishops&lt;/a&gt; in its Church. As for its own clergy, the Vatican has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/email/idUSL2986418520080529&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;promised automatic excommunication&lt;/a&gt; for any Catholic bishop who attempts to ordain a woman as a priest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Catholic cardinal in charge of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7496216.stm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Such a decision is a break with apostolic tradition maintained in all of the Churches in the first millennium, and is therefore a further obstacle for reconciliation between the Catholic Church and the Church of England.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The cardinal warned that the Church of England&#039;s decision would have a long-term impact on the previously fruitful interfaith dialogue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does the Catholic Church&#039;s belief that since Christ chose only men as his apostles, only men can be priests represent an irreconcilable difference between Catholics and Anglicans? What would be gained by a healthy dialogue between the two Christian churches that separated during the 16th century? &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1767635#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Anglican Church">Anglican Church</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Catholicism">Catholicism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Church of England">Church of England</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Vatican">Vatican</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Women&#039;s Rights">Women&#039;s Rights</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:00:39 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1767635</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Tom Hanks/ Prof. Robert Langdon Not Welcomed in Church</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1713956</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/25_2008/TEMP-Image_1_75.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;450&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Tom Hanks is a persona non grata in all of the churches of the Vatican and Rome. The Vatican has banned the filming of &lt;b&gt;Angels and Demons&lt;/b&gt;, Dan Brown&#039;s sequel to &lt;b&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/b&gt; because it is &quot;an offense against God.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The head of the Vatican&#039;s Prefecture For Economic Affairs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article4147839.ece&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;[The stories] turned the Gospels upside down to poison the faith. It would be unacceptable to transform churches into film sets so that his blasphemous novels can be made into mendacious films in the name of business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Church did not even read the script, as the name Dan Brown was enough to merit a ban. In &lt;b&gt;The Da Vinci Code&lt;/b&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzzsugar.com/movie/The_Da_Vinci_Code&quot; &gt;Brown suggests that Jesus married Mary Magdalene&lt;/a&gt; and had children, and &lt;b&gt;Angels and Demons&lt;/b&gt; paints a picture of corrupt leadership in the Catholic Church.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still trying to decide whether viewers are sophisticated enough to distinguish between fiction and accepted theology. Still, while modern moviegoers may wish the Catholic Church lightened up for the sake of art and entertainment, it&#039;s hard to imagine the Church freely giving its stamp of approval. Would it not lend credibility to the theology created by Dan Brown? Do you approve of the Church&#039;s disapproval?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wireimage.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1713956#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Catholic Church">Catholic Church</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/celebrities">celebrities</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Dan Brown">Dan Brown</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Italy">Italy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Religion">Religion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Rome">Rome</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Tom Hanks">Tom Hanks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Vatican">Vatican</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/World of Faith">World of Faith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:30:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1713956</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Vatican Updates the Seven Deadly Sins</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1106723</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like they might have to remake the movie &lt;b&gt;Se7en&lt;/b&gt;, because the Vatican just added &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,336330,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a whole shebang of new sins&lt;/a&gt; — hot, fresh, and updated for the modern world. The list was overhauled in response to the Pope deploring the “decreasing sense of sin” in today’s “secularized world” as well as falling numbers of Roman Catholics going to confession.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl0/10/104169/11_2008/79916989_0.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image preview&quot; height=&quot;360&quot; width=&quot;550&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
What&#039;s new on the list? Pollution, drugs, and genetic manipulations, for starters. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3517050.ece&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the new rulings&lt;/a&gt;, genetic manipulations are considered violations of the fundamental rights of human nature, drugs &quot;weaken the mind and obscure intelligence,&quot; — and all this is combined with the widening social and economic differences between the rich and the poor &quot;cause an unbearable social injustice.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why the update? To find out, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1106723&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1106723#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/culture">culture</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Headline">Headline</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Vatican">Vatican</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/World of Faith">World of Faith</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:04:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1106723</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
