<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>CitizenSugar --  Breaking News, Together.</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/</link>
 <description>Breaking News, Together.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Briefing Book! Fox News Unveils New Post-Election Promo</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/2552807</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;iframe src=&quot;http://www.236.com/ovembed.php?vid=MTg5Njc4Njk2MA==&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;370&quot; noresize=&quot;noresize&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; scrolling=&quot;no&quot; marginwidth=&quot;0&quot; marginheight=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;border:0px;overflow: hidden;&quot;&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;div style=&quot;padding: 0px 5px 5px 5px; width: 410px; text-align: center; font-size: 0.8em;&quot;&gt;Get the latest news &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;satire&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com/video/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;funny videos&lt;/a&gt; at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;236.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Networks&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.236.com/video/2008/new_fox_news_msnbc_promos_10454.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; What would MSNBC&#039;s look like? Fox News debuts first post-election promo.&lt;/a&gt; — 23/6&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstinence&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://jezebel.com/5100337/couples-first-kiss-happened-at-the-altar&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Practicing what they preach? Chicago abstinence teachers  save first kiss for the alter.&lt;/a&gt; — Jezebel&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Schools&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://donklephant.com/2008/12/01/77-want-kids-to-say-pledge-every-day/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Patriotism or brainwashing? Most US voters want kids to say the pledge of allegiance every day.&lt;/a&gt; — Donklephant&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tech&lt;/b&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://sfist.com/2008/12/01/mayor_gavin_newsom_gets_himself_a_y.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Would you upload video suggestion of how to improve your city? SF Mayor Gavin Newsom gets a YouTube page, and asks for videos but disables comments and ratings.&lt;/a&gt; — SFist&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/2552807#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Briefing Book">Briefing Book</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/MSNBC">MSNBC</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:30:55 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2552807</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sarah Palin Hits the Postelection Interview Circuit </title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/2488507</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;TV journalists have been striking the Sarah Palin iron while it&#039;s hot. Last night &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,449884,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FOX News aired Palin&#039;s first postelection&lt;/a&gt; interview, after Greta van Susteren traveled to Alaska to debrief with Palin. And this morning, Sarah&#039;s chat with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27648153/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; Matt Lauer aired on the Today show&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;embed type=&#039;application/x-shockwave-flash&#039; src=&#039;http://foxnews1.a.mms.mavenapps.net/mms/rt/1/site/foxnews1-foxnews-pub01-live/current/videolandingpage/fncLargePlayer/client/embedded/embedded.swf&#039; id=&#039;mediumFlashEmbedded&#039; pluginspage=&#039;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&#039; bgcolor=&#039;#000000&#039; allowScriptAccess=&#039;always&#039; allowFullScreen=&#039;true&#039; quality=&#039;high&#039; name=&#039;undefined&#039; play=&#039;false&#039; scale=&#039;noscale&#039; menu=&#039;false&#039; salign=&#039;LT&#039; scriptAccess=&#039;always&#039; wmode=&#039;false&#039; height=&#039;275&#039; width=&#039;305&#039; flashvars=&#039;playerId=videolandingpage&amp;amp;playerTemplateId=fncLargePlayer&amp;amp;categoryTitle=On The Record&amp;amp;referralObject=3183289&amp;amp;referralParentPlaylistId=f2fbb2b0c994bbf2ba24f62ab95c596f8bd98bbc&amp;amp;referralPlaylistId=df5603c3d11ca9a023b0070cfc5f297e279fd3a7&#039; /&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking with Greta, Palin indicated that she would leave the decision to run for president in 2012 up to God. She said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Faith is a very big part of my life. And putting my life in my creator&#039;s hands — this is what I always do. I&#039;m like, OK, God, if there is an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I&#039;m like, don&#039;t let me miss the open door. . . . And if there is an open door in (20)12 or four years later, and if it is something that is going to be good for my family, for my state, for my nation, an opportunity for me, then I&#039;ll plow through that door.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And regardless of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/2479863&quot; &gt;her propositions for 2012&lt;/a&gt;, Palin believes the 2008 campaign trail wrapped up without any bitter loose ends. She told Matt Lauer this morning that: “I have nothing but honor and admiration and love for him and for his family. And I think that that is mutual. In fact, I talked to him just today, again — and [we’re] touching base nearly every day.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now that the election is one week behind us, do you think we can put Sarah Palin behind, or has her time in the spotlight just begun? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,449884,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/2488507#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Today Show">Today Show</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:46:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2488507</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Todd Palin: Sarah Was &quot;Destined For Higher Positions&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/2028730</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/16/todd-palin-sarah-was-destined-for-higher-positions/&quot;&gt;Todd Palin: Sarah Was &quot;Destined For Higher Positions&quot;&lt;/a&gt;  Todd Palin, in his first major TV interview since his wife became John McCain’s running mate, said Tuesday that Sarah Palin’s nomination was not a “huge surprise” to him, as he believed she was “destined for higher positions.” Palin, known affectionately as Alaska’s “First Dude,” spoke with Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren about snowmobile racing, hockey, fishing, moose hunting, and working on the Alaska oil fields. Part two of the interview airs tonight. </description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/2028730#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Todd Palin">Todd Palin</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:23:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2028730</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Fox News Won&#039;t Air Anti-Obama Ad, Time For a Real Debate?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1888792</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fox News &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/22/fox-news-refuses-to-run-r_n_120599.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;says it won&#039;t air&lt;/a&gt; an ad connecting Barack Obama to a 1960s radical William Ayers. The ad was produced by American Issues Project which happens to have a board member who was paid as a McCain consultant until July 2007.  Thanks to its nonprofit status, AIP can spend an unlimited amount of money. Election experts worry that the ad is illegal because it advocates a candidate, which cannot be done with nonprofit funds. Fox News &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/22/fox-ayers-ad/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;did accidentally air a portion of the ad&lt;/a&gt;, but even a nominal rejection signals that ads like these are starting to raise eyebrows.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/34_2008/72150115.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image preview&quot; height=&quot;395&quot; width=&quot;550&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ayers is a college professor and former member of the Weather Underground, a radical organization that wanted to end the Vietnam War through acts of domestic terrorism. He served with Obama on a board until 2002, and also held a campaign event for Obama when he first decided to enter politics in the 1990s. The American Issues Project ad hits Obama hard saying:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Obama&#039;s political career was launched in Ayers&#039;s home. And the two served together on a left-wing board. Why would Barack Obama be friends with someone who bombed the Capitol and is proud of it? Do you know enough to elect Barack Obama?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Obama hasn&#039;t backed away from the Ayers issue. To find out what he says about Ayers, and to see the ad itself, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1888792&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1888792#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Presidential Election">2008 Presidential Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/The Weather Underground">The Weather Underground</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:30:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1888792</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News Ratings Soar On Politically-Themed Programming</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1883568</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/08/21/fox-news-ratings-soar-on_n_120442.html&quot;&gt;Fox News Ratings Soar on Politically-Themed Programming&lt;/a&gt;  Political-themed programming this week has worked wonders for the already high ratings of the Fox News Channel. Special &lt;b&gt;Character &amp; Conduct&lt;/b&gt; profiles of the two presidential candidates scored high in the cable news ratings taking the place of the vacationing Bill O&#039;Reilly. On Monday, the Barack Obama documentary hosted by Bill Hemmer averaged 2.3 million viewers, Nielsen Media Research said.</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1883568#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 14:24:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1883568</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>87% of Fox Viewers for McCain: News Watchers Discriminate?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1851591</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Though media may or may not be biased (depending on your perception of it) viewers it seems might be. In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/08/07/fox_news/index.html?source=refresh&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;recent Rasmussen poll&lt;/a&gt;, the cable network of choice was a big indicator of how a viewer plans to vote in November. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/32_2008/78901405.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image preview&quot; height=&quot;409&quot; width=&quot;550&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The network that was most closely tied to a candidate? Fox News, with 87 percent of viewers saying they&#039;re likely to vote for John McCain. (The results are similar to 2004 when 88 percent favored Bush.) Though Fox has an anecdotally popular niche among conservatives, they&#039;re not the only ones with pals; other networks lined up as well. Over at CNN, 65 percent said they&#039;ll vote for Obama compared to 26 percent for McCain, and at MSNBC it&#039;s 63 percent to 30 percent for McCain, with the major networks showing similar results. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results do bring up an interesting question about coverage — to see what it is, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1851591&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1851591#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Presidential Election">2008 Presidential Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/CNN">CNN</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/John McCain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/MSNBC">MSNBC</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 08:00:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1851591</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill O&#039;Reilly Takes On Scott McClellan Over Talking Points Claim</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1822350</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/29/bill-oreilly-takes-on-sco_n_115601.html&quot;&gt;Bill O&#039;Reilly Takes On Scott McClellan Over Talking Points Claim&lt;/a&gt;
Bill O&#039;Reilly took on Scott McClellan on Monday night&#039;s &lt;b&gt;O&#039;Reilly Factor&lt;/b&gt; over claims made last week on &lt;b&gt;Hardball&lt;/b&gt; that McClellan and the Bush White House would funnel talking points to the Fox News host (and his colleague, Sean Hannity). After calling McClellan a &quot;liar&quot; and an &quot;idiot&quot; on his radio show Monday, O&#039;Reilly promised to have some fun with the former White House Press Secretary on his TV show that night.</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1822350#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Bill O&#039;Reilly">Bill O&#039;Reilly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Scott McClellan">Scott McClellan</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 08:53:17 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1822350</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Rapper Nas Gives Petition to &quot;Propaganda Machine&quot; Fox News</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1809718</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Rapper Nas joined with the Color of Change and MoveOn to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/23/rapper-nas-delivers-fox-n_n_114645.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;deliver a petition&lt;/a&gt; to the offices of Fox News yesterday. Just after his controversial album hit number one, Nas took the podium protesting the racist attacks he sees coming from Fox against Black Americans and Barack Obama.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/30_2008/82047732.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image preview&quot; height=&quot;399&quot; width=&quot;550&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Delivering over 600,000 signatures to the network, Nas delivered a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1591451/20080723/nas.jhtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;prepared speech&lt;/a&gt; saying, &quot;We already knew that Fox is not a news network; they are a propaganda machine . . . Fox poisons this country every time they air racist propaganda and try to call it news. This should outrage every American that Fox uses hateful language to talk about the person that may be the first black president.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fox declined receipt of the signatures, but issued a statement: &quot;Fox News believes in all protesters exercising their right to free speech, including Nas, who has an album to promote.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That album &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1591030/20080716/nas.jhtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;now called&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;Untitled&lt;/b&gt; had an original, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1572287/20071018/nas.jhtml&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;much more controversial&lt;/a&gt; title. Does this affect his statement against Fox?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see clips of the Fox language Nas finds offensive — served up on last night&#039;s &lt;b&gt;Colbert Report&lt;/b&gt; (where the petition was delivered after Fox refused to accept it) — plus Nas&#039;s interview with Stephen, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1809718&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1809718#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Headline">Headline</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Nas">Nas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Propaganda">Propaganda</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Racism">Racism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/The Colbert Report">The Colbert Report</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:55:15 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1809718</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Jesse Jackson Also Used the OTHER N Word! Hypocritical?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1790871</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/29_2008/79008040.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; width=&quot;325&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Thought last week&#039;s Jackson &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1771597&quot; &gt;nuts heard round the world&lt;/a&gt; was a slip of the tongue? According to Michelle Malkin, &lt;a href=&quot;http://michellemalkin.com/2008/07/16/jesse-jackson-n-word-for-me-but-not-for-thee/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the camera kept rolling&lt;/a&gt; — and recorded right over Jackson using the far more inflammatory N word. He said:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Barack . . . he’s talking down to black people . . . telling n*****s how to behave.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, I&#039;ve heard rap, I get that the term is used colloquially. . . but the Rev. Jackson is the same man who condemned the usage of the word for all when he said this following &lt;b&gt;Seinfeld&lt;/b&gt;&#039;s Michael Richard&#039;s n-word meltdown:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Its roots are rooted in hatred and pain and degradation. And whether it’s hatred toward African-Americans or whether it’s self-hatred, a concession toward it is still wrong.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Who are we to believe? The Jesse Jackson who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/fnc/breaking_what_else_jesse_jackson_said_on_that_fnc_tape_89392.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;drops the N bomb&lt;/a&gt;, or the one who despises it? Though the Fox event may be rooted in campaign rhetoric, the bigger, and more important, question is illustrated in Jackson&#039;s second quote: where he asserts that  the word be retired from all usage. Should anyone use it — or is its power too great and negative connotations too deep to ever utter in modern society? Is a some-can, some-can&#039;t approach so hypocritical that it negates any cries of protest when instances like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tmz.com/2006/11/20/kramers-racist-tirade-caught-on-tape/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Richard&#039;s explosion&lt;/a&gt; occur?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1790871#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Freedom of Speech">Freedom of Speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Jesse Jackson">Jesse Jackson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Scandal">Scandal</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:30:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1790871</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News&#039;s Chris Wallace Unleashes Hell on Rove Questioners</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1785700</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Fox News&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Chris+Wallace&quot; &gt;Chris Wallace&lt;/a&gt; may have misunderstood the point of doing PR when he snapped in front of a crowd of reporters at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://buzzsugar.com/tag/2008+summer+tca&quot; &gt;Television Critics Association&lt;/a&gt; in LA moments ago. Our intrepid Buzz was front and center for the giant meltdown and besides sending texts saying &quot;Rove&#039;s wearing a green tie! It&#039;s too long!&quot; then she says things rapidly got even uglier. Joined on a panel by &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/08/top-clinton-adviser-howar_n_111335.html?page=3&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Howard Wolfson&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,2132,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;John Moody&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Karl+Rove&quot; &gt;Karl Rove&lt;/a&gt;, here&#039;s how the spin hit the fan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/29_2008/fox.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image preview&quot; height=&quot;389&quot; width=&quot;550&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s begin at the end, when the explosion happened. The Fox folks were ready to wrap up, and Wallace said basically, &quot;no. I have something else to say.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Wallace then launched into a stern tirade that he thought there was a huge bias in the questions being asked of Karl Rove — especially regarding the controversy about him not testifying in front of Congress. He raged on why that would have any impact on his ability to work for Fox News, which is an independent news organization. Wallace then asked that he&#039;d be curious to know if a conservative Congress had subpoenaed James Carville, if the reporters would be sitting there asking CNN whether it undermined their credibility to have him as a commentator. The general response from the reporters assembled was says Buzz, &quot;uh, YEAH we would.&quot; Wallace fired back essentially, &quot;oh, you would? Well, I&#039;d be very curious to see that.&quot; The out-of-context blowup was according to Buzz, about a Richter 8 on the tension scale. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see more questions and answers, including those leading up to the rant and the response to the &lt;b&gt;NY Times&lt;/b&gt; photo-doctoring story, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1785700&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1785700#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Summer TCA">2008 Summer TCA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Chris Wallace">Chris Wallace</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Karl Rove">Karl Rove</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 16:01:38 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1785700</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Bill O&#039;Reilly Takes On New York Times, Cries Foul</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1766908</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/08/bill-oreilly-takes-on-emn_n_111432.html&quot;&gt;Bill O&#039;Reilly Takes On New York Times, Cries Foul&lt;/a&gt;
On Monday&#039;s &lt;b&gt;The O&#039;Reilly Factor,&lt;/b&gt; Bill O&#039;Reilly took on the &lt;b&gt;New York Times&lt;/b&gt; and defended &lt;b&gt;Fox &amp; Friends&lt;/b&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427&quot;&gt;their Photoshopping&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;b&gt;Times&lt;/b&gt; reporter Jacques Steinberg. O&#039;Reilly claims the &lt;b&gt;Times&lt;/b&gt; caricatured him in a 2007 book review and called this &quot;the most hypocritical situation we have ever seen.&quot; &quot;Let me get this straight, &lt;b&gt;New York Times&lt;/b&gt;-people&quot; O&#039;Reilly said. &quot;We can&#039;t mock you, but you can mock us? Am I getting this? If the &lt;b&gt;Times&lt;/b&gt; editor Bill Keller would wise up, perhaps their business might improve.&quot;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1766908#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 12:10:37 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1766908</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News Gives NY Times Reporters Yellow Teeth, Big Nose</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I came across these photos, I couldn&#039;t believe my eyes.  Yesterday on &lt;b&gt;Fox and Friends&lt;/b&gt;, Fox News aired photos of &lt;b&gt;New York Times&lt;/b&gt; reporters, calling them &quot;attack dogs.&quot; In the photos, reporters Jacques Steinbert and Steven Reddicliffe &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200807020002&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;became the victims of yellow teeth&lt;/a&gt;, a receding hairline, and exaggerated features. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/27_2008/fox-20080702-steinberg.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image outline preview&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Fox hosts were upset with Steinberg&#039;s recent article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/arts/television/28rati.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; &quot;Fox News Finds Its Rivals Closing In&quot;&lt;/a&gt; which declared that CNN and MSNCB have added viewers at &quot;far more dramatic rate&quot; than Fox, so far this election. When asked if the &lt;b&gt;NY Times&lt;/b&gt; would respond to the image doctoring, the paper&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003823885&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Culture Editor Sam Sifton said no thanks&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;It is fighting with a pig, everyone gets dirty and the pig likes it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fox News has found some pretty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX+News&quot; &gt;creative ways to outrage&lt;/a&gt; me lately. What should be done to address this visual dishonesty? To see the video, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Ethics">Ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Journalism">Journalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/New York Times">New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:00:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Will the Obama Is a Terrorist Narrative Catch On?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1697409</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Obama-is-an-undercover-terrorist rumor seems outlandish to reasonable people; but, it doesn&#039;t seem like it&#039;s going away.  Fox News is doing what it can to make sure its viewers are at best misinformed, and at worst fearful of the Democratic nominee. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;	&lt;div style=&#039;width:455px&#039; id=&quot;spi_tabs_container&quot;&gt;
	   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_top&quot;&gt;
		   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_topL&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
		   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_topR&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
	   &lt;/div&gt;
	   &lt;div class=&quot;panel  chatter_chatter fbceleb &quot; &gt;
			   &lt;center&gt;	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot; src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/static/js/swfobject.js&quot;&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
	&lt;p style=margin:0px;padding:0px id=&quot;player_1696736&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&quot;&gt;Get Flash&lt;/a&gt; to see this player.&lt;/p&gt;
	&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;
	var so1696736 = new SWFObject(&#039;http://images.teamsugar.com/static/flash/mediaplayer.swf&#039;,&#039;mpl&#039;,&#039;425&#039;,&#039;350&#039;,&#039;7&#039;);
	so1696736.addParam(&#039;allowfullscreen&#039;,&#039;true&#039;);
	so1696736.addVariable(&quot;file&quot;,&#039;1696736.flv&#039;);
	so1696736.addVariable(&#039;height&#039;,&#039;350&#039;);
	so1696736.addVariable(&#039;image&#039;,&#039;http://images.teamsugar.com/media/cooked/thumbs/1696736.jpg&#039;);
	so1696736.addVariable(&#039;width&#039;,&#039;425&#039;);
	
	so1696736.write(&#039;player_1696736&#039;);
	&lt;/script&gt;		   &lt;/center&gt;
	   &lt;/div&gt;
	   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_bot&quot;&gt;
		   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_botL&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
		   &lt;div id=&quot;spi_tabs_botR&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
	   &lt;/div&gt;
	&lt;/div&gt;	&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/24_2008/81408682.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;170&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Last week on &lt;b&gt;American&#039;s Pulse&lt;/b&gt;, Fox News host E.D. Hill &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/action_center/fist_bump/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;referred to the celebratory fist bump&lt;/a&gt;, exchanged between Barack and Michelle Obama, as a &quot;terrorist fist jab.&quot; See the video above — you can&#039;t make this stuff up. I find it hard to explain such a characterization as anything more than simply trying to say the words &quot;Obama&quot; and &quot;terrorist&quot; in the same sentence. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Implying Obama is a secret plant for Islamic terrorists has been going on for a while. The rumor even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/did-you-know-that-senator_b_74710.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;graced the front page of a respectable paper&lt;/a&gt; like the &lt;b&gt;Washington Post&lt;/b&gt;. Obama has just set up an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4100170.ece&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Internet war room&lt;/a&gt; to confront the viral forms of the rumor spreading on the web.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Do you think these outrageous Obama conspiracies will fall on deaf ears? Will Obama&#039;s extreme opponents succeed in convincing a significant number of voters that he&#039;s a terrorist, or at least succeed in planting enough subconscious suspicion that many will choose McCain?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/action_center/fist_bump/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1697409#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Presidential Election">2008 Presidential Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Check This">Check This</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Main Stream Media">Main Stream Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Michelle Obama">Michelle Obama</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:15:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1697409</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Front Page: IAEA Concerned About Iran, Zimbabwe Toll, Fox Commentator Apologizes</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1663667</link>
 <description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;IAEA Concerned About Iran:&lt;/b&gt; The International Atomic Energy Agency issued an honest and specific report yesterday saying that Iran’s suspected research into the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/world/middleeast/27iran.html?hp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;development of nuclear weapons&lt;/a&gt; remained “a matter of serious concern” and that Iran continued to owe the agency “substantial explanations.” The report pegged Iran with a willful lack of cooperation, especially answering whether nuclear capabilities are intended more for military use than for energy generation. According to Western intelligence agencies, Iranians have ventured into explosives, uranium processing, and a missile warhead design — nuclear weapons activities. One official said of Iran&#039;s actions, “There are certain parts of their nuclear program where the military seems to have played a role. We want to understand why.”&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/22_2008/Tuesday-350x260.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image center preview&quot; height=&quot;260&quot; width=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Zimbabwe Toll:&lt;/b&gt; Zimbabwe&#039;s opposition leader Morgan Tsvangirai &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/international-zimbabe-election.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;said today&lt;/a&gt; of the violence resulting from the contested election held in March, &quot;Over 50 Zimbabweans have been killed in the past six weeks. More than 25,000 people have been displaced. I&#039;ve been saddened that Zimbabweans are willing to shed the blood of other Zimbabweans over political differences.&quot; The runoff election between Tsvangirai and incumbent Robert Mugabe is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/16/africa/16zim.php&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to be held&lt;/a&gt; June 27.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fox Commentator Apologizes:&lt;/b&gt; Over the weekend, Fox analyst, Liz Trotta, said while discussing Hillary Clinton&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1659569&quot; &gt;RFK remark&lt;/a&gt; “now we have what some are reading as a suggestion that somebody knock off Osama, um, Obama — well, both, if we could.” The Fox News anchor interviewing her was startled saying, “Talk about how you really feel,” as Trotta laughed. Yesterday Trotta &lt;a href=&quot;http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/05/27/same-joke-more-regret/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;went back on&lt;/a&gt; Fox News Channel to apologize. She said, “I am so sorry about what happened yesterday in that lame attempt at humor. I sincerely regret it and apologize to anybody I’ve offended. It’s a very colorful political season, and many of us are making mistakes and saying things that we wish that we hadn’t said.”&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see the video of the incident, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1663667&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1663667#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Elections">Elections</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Front Page">Front Page</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Global Totals">Global Totals</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/IAEA">IAEA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Iran">Iran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Nuclear Weapons">Nuclear Weapons</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Zimbabwe">Zimbabwe</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:55:05 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1663667</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Howard Dean on Fox News Sunday: Your Coverage Is &quot;Shockingly Biased&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1602301</link>
 <description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/04/howard-dean-on-fox-news-s_n_100023.html&quot;&gt;Howard Dean on Fox News Sunday: Your Coverage Is &quot;Shockingly Biased&quot;&lt;/a&gt;: During an appearance on &lt;b&gt;Fox News Sunday&lt;/b&gt; this morning, Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean said that Fox&#039;s news coverage has at times been &quot;shockingly biased, and I think that&#039;s wrong and I just say so right up front.&quot; Dean also said he agreed with the netroots campaign to boycott the Democratic debates on the network.

</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/node/1602301#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/aside">aside</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 10:55:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1602301</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sanctuary Cities: Hillary Won&#039;t Crack Down — Should We?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1598316</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/10/104169/18_2008/71103267.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;450&quot; width=&quot;300&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Hillary Clinton dropped in on Bill O&#039;Reilly yesterday and talk turned to immigration and sanctuary cities. O&#039;Reilly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200805/POL20080502c.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;asked her&lt;/a&gt; if she would crack down on sanctuary cities — she said &quot;no,&quot; arguing that illegal aliens should not be discouraged from reporting crimes. Though she&#039;s not in favor of &quot;forcing them into the shadows,&quot; Clinton had this to say &quot;I&#039;m 100 percent in favor of tightening our borders, of enforcing the laws against employers, of going after the kind of abuses that we see in the job market.&quot; Adding that illegals who commit crimes &quot;should be deported, no questions asked.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also came out against immigration raids saying the American people don&#039;t want police going door to door at businesses and homes, looking for illegal aliens. Is this true?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The topic of sanctuary cities was &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2007/11/giuliani-romney.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;famously visited&lt;/a&gt; in a Republican debate when Giuliani accused Romney of running a sanctuary mansion. But what are these so-called sanctuaries, and are they so terrible? To find out, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1598316&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1598316#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Bill O&#039;Reilly">Bill O&#039;Reilly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Immigration">Immigration</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Sanctuary Cities">Sanctuary Cities</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:30:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1598316</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hillary Clinton Going on O&#039;Reilly Factor: Good Idea?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1589864</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;!-- no rss --&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;epoll-view-1589864&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;new Ajax.Request(&#039;/epoll/view/1589864&#039;,{method:&#039;get&#039;,onSuccess:function(transport){var epoll=$(&#039;epoll-view-1589864&#039;);epoll.update(transport.responseText);}});&lt;/script&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;!-- /no rss --&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hillary Clinton is set to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/04/clinton-vs-orei.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;appear&lt;/a&gt; on the Fox News&#039; O&#039;Reilly Factor tonight! Democrats and progressives in general typically view the show&#039;s conservative host, Bill O&#039;Reilly, as a sworn enemy, or at least unworthy of recognition. But, it looks like tonight, there is another Bill in Hillary&#039;s life.
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/18_2008/hillary-loves-bill.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image center preview&quot; height=&quot;273&quot; width=&quot;409&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
I suspect that the interview will be pretty civil, and O&#039;Reilly&#039;s &quot;gotcha&quot; questions will probably give Hillary a chance to deride her absent opponent Barack Obama. O&#039;Reilly may have an incentive to see Hillary win the nomination, as many conservatives have an anti-Hillary script readily available for the general election. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last Sunday, Barack &lt;a href=&quot;http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/04/26/obama-no-more-debates-before-next-primary/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;made his debut&lt;/a&gt; on Fox News, where he rejected Hillary&#039;s calls for another debate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What do you make of the Hill-Bill showdown? Does Hillary deserve some credit for treading into hostile territory? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hillaryclinton.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/1589864&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Hillary Clinton Going on O&amp;#039;Reilly Factor: Good Idea?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes! Hillary is proving she will cross the aisle. Hey Bill&#039;s audience are Americans too.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yes! I want a candidate who is willing to do anything to beat the Right&#039;s attack machine.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Maybe. But, this hurts the Democrats — she will throw Obama under the bus.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; No. I doubt this will please the party leaders and superdelegates.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;4&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; No way! Dems should go on Fox News, but that nut O&#039;Reilly should not be encouraged. &lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;5&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other. I&#039;ll tell you in the comments.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1589864&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1589864#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Presidential Election">2008 Presidential Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Bill O&#039;Reilly">Bill O&#039;Reilly</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Citizen Poll">Citizen Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Democrats">Democrats</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 12:15:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1589864</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News: Love It, Hate It, or Tolerate It?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1544008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This could be the definitive documentary about that great wedge issue that is Fox News. I&#039;m not casting aspersions at the &quot;Fair and Balanced,&quot; but you know it&#039;s true: people either love it or hate it. Last night &lt;b&gt;The Daily Show&lt;/b&gt; ran an amusing and pointed profile of the foxy network. It&#039;s a two-parter, but it&#039;s Friday! Take a break and check it out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;center&gt;&lt;embed FlashVars=&quot;videoId=165990&quot; src=&#039;http://www.thedailyshow.com/sitewide/video_player/view/default/swf.jhtml&#039; quality=&#039;high&#039; bgcolor=&#039;#cccccc&#039; width=&#039;332&#039; height=&#039;316&#039; name=&#039;comedy_central_player&#039; align=&#039;middle&#039; allowScriptAccess=&#039;always&#039; allownetworking=&#039;external&#039; type=&#039;application/x-shockwave-flash&#039; pluginspage=&#039;http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer&#039;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/center&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OK, I admit I have been known to make a critical remark or two about Fox News around here, but it&#039;s a complicated relationship. I don&#039;t hate the notion that a network should be able to provide a specific lens by which to view the news, but I do find some of their techniques a little ham-fisted. Be conservative, that&#039;s great — just don&#039;t be cheesy about it? But then loud noises, aggressive flag/explosion graphics and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,1223,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Alan Colmes&lt;/a&gt; scare me a little, so I tend to stay away. Not because I don&#039;t agree with them, just that it&#039;s not my preferred method of news delivery.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How about you? Are you a Fox News watcher, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.outfoxed.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a member&lt;/a&gt; of the &lt;b&gt;Outfoxed&lt;/b&gt; nation? Do you love it? Hate it? Don&#039;t see what the big deal is? If you&#039;re a watcher, do you think that it tells objective news, or do you like it specifically because it&#039;s news that makes an argument? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To see the second part of the clip, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1544008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1544008#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Check This">Check This</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Lighten Up">Lighten Up</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/The Daily Show">The Daily Show</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:57 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1544008</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Can Fox News Survive the End of the Bush Administration? </title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1509001</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;!-- no rss --&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;epoll-view-1509001&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;new Ajax.Request(&#039;/epoll/view/1509001&#039;,{method:&#039;get&#039;,onSuccess:function(transport){var epoll=$(&#039;epoll-view-1509001&#039;);epoll.update(transport.responseText);}});&lt;/script&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;!-- /no rss --&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl0/19/193328/13_2008/fox_news-753140.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;200&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;I&#039;ve always wondered how Stephen Colbert and Keith Olbermann will transition on Jan. 20, 2009 — the day George W. Bush will officially retire to his Texas ranch. But there is someone else I forgot: Fox News. What will the highest-rated cable news channel do without its raison d&#039;être? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Time&lt;/b&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1725955,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;recently discussed&lt;/a&gt; the channel&#039;s affair with the Bush Administration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fox News is not simply a mouthpiece for the Bush White House: it rose with Bush after 2000 and 9/11, was played on TVs in his White House and reflected the same surety and flag-lapel-pin confidence in its tone and star-spangled look. It was not just a hit; it was the network of the moment. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, how will Fox News handle the next president? Will it eagerly channel outrage at a Democratic president? Will it embrace a President McCain?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/1509001&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Can Fox News Survive the End of the Bush Administration? &lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Yay! Conservative hosts and viewers need refuge from the liberal media.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Nay. Fox News and George W. Bush are both lame ducks!&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1509001&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1509001#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Citizen Poll">Citizen Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/George W. Bush">George W. Bush</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/On the Newsstand">On the Newsstand</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:01:43 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1509001</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Texas Republicans Vote for Clinton — Good Strategy? </title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1099512</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;!-- no rss --&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;epoll-view-1099512&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;new Ajax.Request(&#039;/epoll/view/1099512&#039;,{method:&#039;get&#039;,onSuccess:function(transport){var epoll=$(&#039;epoll-view-1099512&#039;);epoll.update(transport.responseText);}});&lt;/script&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;!-- /no rss --&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl0/19/193328/10_2008/74067117.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right preview&quot; height=&quot;400&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Not sure if you caught The Notion link in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1099352&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Link Time&lt;/a&gt; about Rush Limbaugh&#039;s master plan to help Republicans win. The conservative radio personality urged Texas Republicans to vote for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. On Tuesday night, Rush told Fox News:
&lt;blockquote&gt;They&#039;re in the midst of tearing themselves apart right now. It is fascinating to watch, and it&#039;s all going to stop if Hillary loses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve heard accounts from Texas poll workers, who say Republicans in fact voted for Clinton.  One Texan Republican, turned Hillary &quot;supporter,&quot; wanted her vote to count, but was angered by the big &quot;Democrat&quot; stamp placed on her ballot. You can&#039;t have your spoiler and eat it, too! &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Dems have tried this trick before. DailyKos.com urged Michigan Dems to vote for Mitt Romney. What do you think about Rush&#039;s strategy? Are the Republicans benefiting from a drawn-out Democratic primary?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/1099512&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Texas Republicans Vote for Clinton — Good Strategy? &lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Rush is right. Let the Dems bring up subjects like race, religion, and national security.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Rush is wrong. The Dems are benefitting from the vetting and media coverage. &lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; If it helps your party win, and doesn&#039;t break any rules, why not?&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Rush, Smush. Hillary&#039;s win shows her strengths. Watch out GOP!&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;4&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other. I&#039;ll tell you in the comments.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1099512&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1099512#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Barack Obama">Barack Obama</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Conservative Talk Radio">Conservative Talk Radio</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Democrats">Democrats</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Hillary Clinton">Hillary Clinton</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Poll">Poll</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Republicans">Republicans</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Rush Limbaugh">Rush Limbaugh</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Texas">Texas</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1099512</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Oh, Fox News! Making a DHS Report a Real Stomach-Turner?</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1038065</link>
 <description>&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;!-- no rss --&gt;&lt;div id=&quot;epoll-view-1038065&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;script type=&quot;text/javascript&quot;&gt;new Ajax.Request(&#039;/epoll/view/1038065&#039;,{method:&#039;get&#039;,onSuccess:function(transport){var epoll=$(&#039;epoll-view-1038065&#039;);epoll.update(transport.responseText);}});&lt;/script&gt;&lt;noscript&gt;&lt;!-- /no rss --&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right. In some places it&#039;s still a little before breakfast, and well, &lt;b&gt;Fox News&lt;/b&gt; just made sure I don&#039;t want any. A recent Department of Homeland Security report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330415,00.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;aiming to educate&lt;/a&gt; about the recent spate of female suicide bombers included this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;
&quot;Female suicide bombers may carry explosives devices in a backpack, briefcase, or purse, or hidden in an article of clothing . . . They have also carried explosives in prosthetic devices that mimic the look of a pregnant woman.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And now for the picture.
&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl0/10/104169/07_2008/Picture%201.png&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image center preview&quot; height=&quot;346&quot; width=&quot;345&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Did Fox News trip over the line and sensationalize this story? They were, technically, reporting the news . . . Am I just being too sensitive?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.foxnews.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;form action=&quot;/1038065&quot;  method=&quot;post&quot; id=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;poll&quot;&gt;  &lt;div class=&quot;vote-form&quot;&gt;    &lt;div class=&quot;choices&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label&gt;Oh, Fox News! Making a DHS Report a Real Stomach-Turner?&lt;/label&gt;
 &lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;0&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Oh. Oh, no. The story is shocking enough — the photo is over the line gross and uncalled for.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;1&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; What&#039;s the big deal? That&#039;s just the photo the DHS included in the report. Get over it.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;2&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Ha. I don&#039;t have an opinion right or wrong, but those darn scamps at Fox have done it again.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;form-item&quot;&gt;
 &lt;label class=&quot;option&quot;&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;radio&quot; name=&quot;edit[choice]&quot; value=&quot;3&quot;   class=&quot;form-radio&quot; /&gt; Other.  I&#039;ll tell you in the comments.&lt;/label&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;
    &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[nid]&quot; id=&quot;edit-nid&quot; value=&quot;1038065&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;input type=&quot;submit&quot; name=&quot;op&quot; value=&quot;Vote&quot;  class=&quot;form-submit&quot; /&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;&lt;input type=&quot;hidden&quot; name=&quot;edit[form_id]&quot; id=&quot;edit-form_id&quot; value=&quot;epoll_view_voting&quot;  /&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;&lt;/noscript&gt;&lt;!-- no strip poll --&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1038065#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/DHS">DHS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Poll">Poll</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>CitizenSugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1038065</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
