<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>CitizenSugar --  Breaking News, Together.</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/</link>
 <description>Breaking News, Together.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Alaska Inquiry Finds that Sarah Palin Abused Powers </title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/2341263</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/41_2008/83143624.xlarger.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image right xlarger&quot; height=&quot;400&quot; width=&quot;301&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;An investigation by the Alaska Legislature, released this evening, concluded that Sarah Palin &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us/politics/11trooper.html?_r=1&amp;amp;hp&amp;amp;oref=&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;abused the powers of the office of Governor of Alaska&lt;/a&gt; by pressuring subordinates with the goal of getting her ex-brother-in-law State Trooper Michael Wooton fired. The 236-page report, at the center of &quot;Troopergate,&quot; also found that she was within her powers when she dismissed the public safety commissioner, who was the boss of the ex-brother-in-law. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The report, which could now have national implications, holds that Palin violated the Alaska Executive Branch Ethics Act when she exerted pressure, and when she allowed her husband to do so, too. It states:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Such impermissible and repeated contacts create conflicts of interests for subordinate employees who must choose to either please a superior or run the risk of facing that superior’s displeasure and the possible consequences of that displeasure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legal and political implications of the report are uncertain. The Alaska legislature could censure Palin, and US voters may question the McCain campaign&#039;s characterization of Palin as a reformer. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gettyimages.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Source&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/2341263#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/2008 Presidential Election">2008 Presidential Election</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Alaska">Alaska</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Ethics">Ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/John McCain">John McCain</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Sarah Palin">Sarah Palin</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Troopergate">Troopergate</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 21:13:12 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/2341263</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Fox News Gives NY Times Reporters Yellow Teeth, Big Nose</title>
 <link>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;When I came across these photos, I couldn&#039;t believe my eyes.  Yesterday on &lt;b&gt;Fox and Friends&lt;/b&gt;, Fox News aired photos of &lt;b&gt;New York Times&lt;/b&gt; reporters, calling them &quot;attack dogs.&quot; In the photos, reporters Jacques Steinbert and Steven Reddicliffe &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamatters.org/items/200807020002&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;became the victims of yellow teeth&lt;/a&gt;, a receding hairline, and exaggerated features. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.teamsugar.com/files/upl1/19/193328/27_2008/fox-20080702-steinberg.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot; class=&quot;image outline preview&quot; height=&quot;220&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Fox hosts were upset with Steinberg&#039;s recent article &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/28/arts/television/28rati.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; &quot;Fox News Finds Its Rivals Closing In&quot;&lt;/a&gt; which declared that CNN and MSNCB have added viewers at &quot;far more dramatic rate&quot; than Fox, so far this election. When asked if the &lt;b&gt;NY Times&lt;/b&gt; would respond to the image doctoring, the paper&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003823885&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Culture Editor Sam Sifton said no thanks&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;It is fighting with a pig, everyone gets dirty and the pig likes it.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fox News has found some pretty &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX+News&quot; &gt;creative ways to outrage&lt;/a&gt; me lately. What should be done to address this visual dishonesty? To see the video, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Ethics">Ethics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/FOX News">FOX News</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Journalism">Journalism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/Media">Media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.citizensugar.com/tags/New York Times">New York Times</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 11:00:02 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>LibertySugar</dc:creator>
 <guid>http://www.citizensugar.com/1754427</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
