
This is an odd case of censoring that if applied at the debate last night, could have made things look very different. In a congressional debate in Pennsylvania, a
TV station has censored remarks made by one of the candidates because they were erroneous. Bleeping out a mistake?

A defendant in an obscenity trial
hopes to introduce Google search data to show that community tastes go beyond apple pie and toward a more sexual appetite. Under the law, a jury or judge must decide if the alleged obscenity violates the vague benchmark of "community standards."
In the past, defendants have relied on the wide availability of sexual material in the community, to prove standards.