Quantcast
 

Poll: Is Election 2008 Must-See TV?

Wed, 01/16/2008 - 12:10am by LibertySugar
189 Views - 14 comments

The writers' strike is depriving us of scripted drama. Even so, New York Times columnist David Carr says the breakout television hit this season is the presidential election.

Carr wrote:

"January was supposed to be the month when the writers’ strike took its toll [...]. Instead, the primary season is serving as the backdrop for one of the most compelling runs of event television in years, creating the kind of chatter network marketers would kill for and spectacular ratings for cable news."

Has election coverage satisfied your desire for television drama?


14 Comments Add a Comment

  • MSucre's picture
    MSucre
    1

    While tihs certainly wont help the writers' with their strike, this could be a good thing for American politics. News programs so often report on celebrity news instead of important political happenings. Maybe this strike is helping reporters prioritize.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • nyaradzom2001's picture
    nyaradzom2001
    3

    i am honest to god sick of the American elections they are the most painfully drawn out elections on God's green earth. what a waste of money!!

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • legalbeagle's picture
    legalbeagle
    4

    I would be watching anyway, but thats just me~
    I think its great that people are paying attention!!! I do miss 30 Rock but at least people are getting involved and interested in the things that really matter.

    American elections may be drawn out and costly... this one especially... but we're electing the leader of the free world- we might not want to rush into anything. Also, how badly would people criticize Americans if we didnt do this?

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • Beanalby's picture
    Beanalby
    5

    I wouldn't mind it if it weren't for the fact that the news networks cover things like it's American Idol.

    "Ooh look he's ahead! And how he's ahead! Whooo's gonna be ahead?? This guy hates that guy! Race race race! DRAMA!"

    Never reporting the actual ISSUES or anything like that.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • dclion's picture
    dclion
    6

    It'd be better if some of these people were actually worth covering. This election is going to be a choice between the better of two evils.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • Neekoh's picture
    Neekoh
    8

    I don't ever watch TV, so it doesn't matter to me. I read the news regardless.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • gooniette's picture
    gooniette
    9

    I don't get my election news from TV. The networks are way too biased and don't cover the candidates equally.
    They seem to forget that it's not up to them to choose candidates for us to pick from.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • philleif's picture
    philleif
    10

    This reminds me that, if she's elected, Hillary promised to bring "Friends" back on the air.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • Powerpuffgirl's picture
    Powerpuffgirl
    11

    I'm tuned in, but not because of the writers' strike. This presidential election strikes a chord with so many and I personally find it encouraging to see so much diversity in this year's race.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment
  • Princesskitty22's picture
    Princesskitty22
    12

    I prefer to read my news, as a rule; mostly because I hate commentators ( I don't think I spelled that right) on tv news shows. They drive me crazy for some reason. So, while I've watched a little bit of the coverage, if my shows were on, I would watch them instead.

    45 weeks 5 days ago Report Comment

Leave a Comment

To post comments, please sign in or register.



Morsels of goodness, delivered daily.

Enter your email below:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 











©1976-2008 Sugar Inc. | Privacy (updated July-4-2008) | Terms of Use | Copyright Policy | Advertise | Contact Us