Only one child?!?! Holy Cr@p! I was planning a big family too. I guess I won't become Chinese

overpopulation　always been a issue for China. There are already too many restriction in china regarding population control. I doubt they will change this policy regardless of the their moral judgments.

Sounds like they need another war to reduce the population. That's what we've always used in the past.

It would be hard to think of a child as a replacement for one that has been lost. Although I do think it is good of the Chinese Goverment to do this.

They have been doing a lot of stories on NPR on China. One said that they spent $360 per square foot on government buildings, and only $60 per foot on the schools.

Overpopulation is an big problem, not only in China but the one-child policy is not the solution: mostly, it leads to baby girls left in orphanages (if lucky). What UnDave35 said above is unfortunately true: wars are excellent as regulators of population.

How sad. I can't imagine being limited to one child. How strange that they call it a "legal replacement" too.

Communism is so warm, isn't it?

China could not survive as a country if they abandoned the one child policy.
But they could decrease the population even more: if they catch a woman aborting a female fetus, they should tie her tubes.

I can't believe some of the above comments claiming war is an excellent regulator of population. Even during the blood bath that was WWII, "only" about 40 to 72 million people, depending on estimates died. This net loss doesn't even consider the "baby boom" that invariably follows a war, especially in winning countries. The above blog cites China's policy as preventing 400 million births. Today's wars have tried to minimize death tolls as well, with all our precision weapons delivered from jets, boats, or missile silos. Unless you're talking about a war that resorts to nuclear, chemical and biological weapons - morbid as it sounds - you're not going to get those kind of kill numbers.

China's one-child policy may be flawed, including the leaving of infant girls with orphanages, but also the abortion of girls in preference of boys, and even killing of infant girls after birth. And China will pay for it in the long run when the disproportionate population of men can't find wives (creating at least two generations of bachelor societies). But to suggest a war to end lives would be more efficient or better than preventing lives in the first place seems incredible! Maybe instead of the carefully regulated system China has going now, they can revert back to their failed Great Leap Forward or hey, maybe a rural villager somewhere can instigate a new Taiping Rebellion. Of course, I jest.

Hmmm if anything happened to my little angel, i don't know if I'd want to birth another child -- obviously it can not be a 'replacement'. I'm sure thats not what the people who are praying for their children are thinking of now, the government should really honor their deaths by looking into improving infrastructure to prevent such a huge travesty next time.

kamiko, my understanding is that the Chinese government is planning on improving infrastructure. I think the emphasis is still on rescue and recovery, but then they're planning on bringing in geologists and engineers to determine whether it is safe to rebuild there or at another location. The plan, as I read it, would be to rebuild bigger and better (not hard, since a lot of the collapsed buildings date back to the early 1900s) within 3 years.

I do think it is a good idea that China is allowing "legal replacements." It's all because of the same reason that baby girls are left or aborted ... it's the Chinese culture. When parents get too old to care for themselves, they don't go to a nursing home ... they go to live with their son. Well, if you're only allowed on child, you're going to want it to be a son so you are taken care of in your old age.

It may not be a good idea on how to fix the over population in China. But do you really think that the Chinese government is going to listen to an American (or anyone else for that matter) about how to run their country?

One child can never replace another, but I think a loosening of the policy in this instance is the right thing to do.

i think them being able to have another child is only fair. i think they should have something like that in America. based on your income your only allowed a certain amount of children.