Ever since the sad news of Senator Ted Kennedy's brain tumor diagnosis broke, I've been seeing a barrage of news coverage that seems pretty postmortem. Article topics include:
- Boston contemplates life after Ted Kennedy
- Many possible successors to Kennedy
- A timeline of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's life
The coverage makes me think media companies are rolling out their prefabricated eulogies a little too soon. In fact, if someone wasn't paying close attention, they might assume the Senator already died!
Are these reports an honor to Senator Kennedy, or disrespectful? Since he did just receive a very serious diagnosis, should the country take the opportunity to celebrate all of his achievements while he is still alive? Should the media adopt a more hopeful and positive outlook in order to support Kennedy's efforts to battle the tumor?
on Yahoo! |











I'm not sure if disrespectful is the word but they're certainly disheartening. It's very hard to keep a positive attitude when fighting cancer and people talking about you as though you've already died certainly doesn't help...Now that I think about it though, maybe disrespectful is the right word. I'm reconsidering because his family members must be devastated every time they hear a eulogy-esq report on the news. I do think it would be best if the coverage take a more positive, hopeful turn, especially given that Kennedy has been released from the hospital.