Quantcast
 

Food Stamp Stats Show US Hungry for Help

Wed, 04/09/2008 - 8:00am by CitizenSugar
806 Views - 70 comments

Yesterday morning's talk about Haiti's food riots turned my attention to tummies close to home. Specifically, food stamps. Perhaps once considered the currency of that spurious caricature the "welfare queen," government food assistance is a harbinger of tight times — and tightening belts. Take a look at these stats out this week:

  • This year, 28 million Americans are predicted to receive food stamps. That's the highest number since 1960.
  • 1 in 8 Michigan residents receive food stamps.
  • 1.17 million Pennsylvanians were receiving food stamps in a February count, up 4.4 percent from last year and close to a record high.
  • 1 in 3 Oklahoma kids have been on food stamps at some point in the last year.

To receive government food aid, applicants have to pass a very strict asset test and a very strict income test. Some say the threshold to qualify is too high. Once a person qualifies, benefits average about $100 a month per person in the family. In New Hampshire, a state that's seen a 7 percent increase in food stamp beneficiaries, the maximum daily allotment for someone in a three-person, incomeless household is $4.53 a day. It would take some pretty creative cooking to eat on less than $5 a day.

Are those benefits too small? Should we still be relying on the almost 50-year-old program, or should we be taking care of local food needs with private or faith-based programs?

Serious news notwithstanding — never fear! Our fancier international friends recognize that the US is on a budget. To see how they're offering assistance, read more.

Harry’s Bar, the Venice watering hole of Ernest Hemingway, is offering a discount to “poor” Americans. They've posted a sign that reads,

“Harry’s Bar of Venice, in an effort to make the American victims of subprime loans happier, has decided to give them a special 20 per cent discount on all items of the menu during the short term of their recovery.”

Well! That 20 percent off calamari will certainly help. . . right?

Source

on Yahoo!

70 Comments Add a Comment

  • KrisSugar's picture
    KrisSugar
    1

    Sorry, my tight budget only accommodates trips to the cheapside of Naples. But thanks for the offer.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Jillness's picture
    Jillness
    2

    I have many thoughts about food stamps!!

    When I was in high school, I worked as a check out girl at the grocery store. When people would come in with food stamps, many times they would buy Oreos, Doritos, soda, etc. There are no restrictions as long as it is "food".

    When women would come in WIC certificates (Women, Infant, and Children program), the certificates would say: 1 lb. Cheese, 1 dozen eggs, 1 gallon juice, 1 loaf bread, etc. They would list specific wholesome items that were nutritional. They also had exclusions, like if it said "Juice" it had to be 100% juice. You couldn't buy "juice drink" with only 10% real juice in it.

    It is my belief that instead of food stamps, we would get more nutritional mileage out that money if we modeled it after the WIC program.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mondaymoos's picture
    mondaymoos
    3

    I agree with you completely, Jillness. When I was living in Oklahoma, I worked at a grocery store. The most insulting part was when the girl handing me the foodstamp card has her acrylic nails and highlights in her hair. Give me a f*cking break.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    5

    At this moment in time there are no where near enough private or faith based programs to help near record numbers of families in need. If you start slapping programs together now, a lot would end up being nothing but government rip-offs. Someday, we should all get together and decide what we want private, what we want local, what we want state and what we want federal, but once the boat starts taking on water debate isn't going to help anyone.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hausfrau's picture
    hausfrau
    6

    I agree with you Jill, I've seen that happen many times...

    Out of curiousity, do states like Cali and others with illegal immigration programs allow illegal immigrants to qualify for food stamps?

    That could be a reason for the rise..

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    7

    It wouldn't have a big impact on the rise because there hasn't been a surge in illegal immigrants.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stina829's picture
    stina829
    8

    Hmmm... I actually work in the agency that issues the food stamps to people in my locality - I'm really one of the 5 people in my office that issues the card to the client.

    And I can honestly say that the amount of cards I issue a week has significantly gone UP. And they keep going up. More and more people are coming in.

    It's actually a little depressing.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hausfrau's picture
    hausfrau
    9

    Huh?!

    There hasn't been a surge in illegal immigrants since 1960?

    I would disagree.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    10

    "This year, 28 million Americans are predicted to receive food stamps. That's the highest number since 1960."

    That doesn't mean there's been a surge in anything. It says that this year has the most since 1960. There are about 122-million more people in the U.S. now than there were in 1960.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • hausfrau's picture
    hausfrau
    11

    I know, thats why I was askng the question if illegal immigration is even a factor.

    But I still think its shortsighted to think we have no more illegal immigrants in this country now than in 1960.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    12

    No one said we didn't have more illegals now than in 1960, but an increase of about 275,000 people a year over 48 years isn't a surge.

    And none of the states mentioned in the article are among the top six with highest immigration levels.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • zeze's picture
    zeze
    14

    While I do think anything that makes us a healthier society is positive, I think there are some legal issues with your idea jillness.

    With WIC its okay to regulate to make sure babies get the nutrition they need as babies. (especially with the risk of women using the funds for other things, this is supposed to be for food for the baby and the mother for the well-being of the baby)

    But I think there are constitutional issues with "forcing the poor to eat healthy or not eat at all" - while I know your are not being that extreme, that is how it would be seen. The big issue will be "people have a right to eat what they like"

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • Jillness's picture
    Jillness
    16

    Funny, my college English professor had the same idea! "So we should force poor people to eat generic peanut butter instead of Skippy?", she screached at me. (not that you are taking her position, though). "The ingredients in Skippy and Ralph's peanut butter are the same, you think tax payers should waste money simply for a brand name label?" was my reply.

    I see it like this, food related welfare is to help people get nutrition so they don't starve. It isn't intended to give people recreational food. It is sustinance to survive. I don't think it is right to be concerned for a baby's well being, and to ignore the well being of adults to the detriment of tax payers in our society. It would not prevent them from buying Oreos with their own money, so I don't really see any "force". I think government funded food should be nutritional, because that is the intent of welfare at all.

    And if you allow people to buy cheese, you aren't really forcing them to eat "healthy". It just has more nutrition than junk food.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • bellasugar's picture
    bellasugar
    17

    It's so sad that in a country this wealthy, so many people are going hungry. And I think it's going to get worse. I read a Times story a week ago that talked about how food banks are seeing increased need. I think the US should revise its rules for food stamps, giving anybody who needs food the chance to have it. Like Citizen says, who can feed a family of three on less than $5 a day?

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lula29's picture
    lula29
    18

    I agree with Jillness, because the more nutritious food goes a longer way.

    It's a government program, and as pointed out by the WIC program, it can obviously be done, so why not.

    One can look at the states listed as having an increase and plainly see that illegal immigrants aren't causing the rise.

    Food prices have gone up, plain and simple. Milk is at $4-$5 a gallon in some places.

    Working families are suffering. They say that food banks can't even keep up with the demand.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    19

    It's never going to get a politician votes though, to say let's spend more tax money on making sure the poor are well fed. For some reason, people would rather see their taxes go on refurbishing sports stadiums and things like that.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lula29's picture
    lula29
    20

    And when crimes rise because it will, because no matter what, hungry people have to eat and will do so by any means necessary if it comes down to it, then what?

    I know what, there will be people supporting more taxes to build more jails.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    21

    Well, most people are going to know what I have to say, it should be state issue, and private funds, not federal. But I have to say I totally agree with Jillness. WIC is a great program for pregnant women. If you are on food stamps, you should not have buy nutritious food, not candy.

    "I think the US should revise its rules for food stamps, giving anybody who needs food the chance to have it."

    Where should we get these funds? Raise taxes even more?

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • cine_lover's picture
    cine_lover
    22

    Oops! "you should not have buy nutritious food, not candy."

    Should read "you should have to buy nutritious food, not candy."

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mymellowman's picture
    mymellowman
    24

    Yes, let's tax the oil companies so that they raise the price of gas and gas gets even more expensive.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mymellowman's picture
    mymellowman
    25

    Zeze: I see where you are going with your point, but I do not believe there are any Constitutional issues as the freedom to choose what food you buy with Socialistic programs really isn't a Constitutional Issue. (I will admit that there are probably a few judges who could make a ruling or two from the bench to prove me differently though.)

    Additionally, many of these programs are state run programs, not federal programs. No one is forcing anyone to go onto one of these programs, so I can't see how these could be construed as a constitutional issue.

    Furthermore, I believe with this logic, we could also say that it is a Constitutional Issue that people in the armed forces have to eat some of the rations that they do. All-in-all, I feel worse for what some of our troops have to eat in comparison to someone on WIC.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • piper23's picture
    piper23
    26

    I also worked in a grocery store in high school and some college and saw what I would term a significant abuse of the welfare system. How can someone afford a Navigator, new nails, a hairdo from hell and not be able to feed their families? Its called priorities, and a gas guzzling expensive SUV, tacky acrylic nails and extensions should not be your priority if the goverment is feeding your family. If I had to utilize foodstamps I would be happy with whatever was given to me, I wouldn't complain if I had to eat no name brand peanut butter instead of jiffy.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • stephley's picture
    stephley
    27

    They're raising the prices every day anyway, this woud least siphon a little of that money back.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mymellowman's picture
    mymellowman
    28

    Whether or not they raise it, adding taxes will only raise it more and hit many of those who already can't afford to live.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • angelfromlsu's picture
    angelfromlsu
    29

    Maybe allow a significant discount for fresh ingredients instead of packaged foods. And fresh ingredients will last much longer than other stuff. A bag of chips will last a family one night (I'm guessing...) but veggies can be re-served and proteins can allow for various meals.

    There was a mention of food stamps on another board when talking about Walmart. People mentioned stuff about buying DVD's with cash and their food with the food stamp card. The board got very racist, very quickly unfortunately.

    I seriously think if you are asking for government assistance, you do not deserve the LUXURY of eating Oreo's and candy. Candy is not a neccessity. I don't care if you are pregnant, have children, or anything.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • dixieangel0722's picture
    dixieangel0722
    31

    First of all I never knew this site was here, I just stublemed upon it. Sorry to say I register just so I could respond to what some of the comment that have already been made. First of all not everyone using food stamp are like those describe by you and some others on here. I have worked most of my life until at the age of only 35 I developed heart problems. So now my husband is the only one working and providing for our family and yes he is a stand up guy because he not only provides for us but he is not a dead beat dad who does not take responsiblity for his other children who are not with us yet!!!!!!!!! When I was unable to work our financial stituation hit rock bottom, my father agree to let us stay with him and get back on our feet. He is 72 years old and had a stroke last month. So now we our holding together a household of 7 and damn right I receive food stamps. I do almost all the meals in the home and I have to make less than 500.00 go the month, which I can usually do with some help from my husbands last check of the month. So for you to run your mouth and say that we should be only allowed to purchase certain things is so wrong. Like pop, no my children do not drink it but by damn I deserve something small as a treat too. I do not buy sugar cereal, or sugary snacks, I make most of what my kids eat so that I know what is in it. As for WIC I received it for awhile but it is the most unrational system that I have ever seen. I told me that my son who is 4 years old, almost 4 ft tall and 55 lb was over weight. So I guess someone hiegth does not factor in. And yeah they give you cheese, milk, juice, peanut butter, cereal, which does help but hell what am I going to do with the cheese and peanut butter with no bread, flour and anything else to mix it with.

    I know that I have been going off here but you never know who toes you are going to step on with what you say and how you say it. As once said by the greatest body in the world THOSE WHO LIVE IN GLASS HOUSE SHOULD NOT BE THE FIRST TO CAST STONES. You never know what might happen in your life.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • dixieangel0722's picture
    dixieangel0722
    32

    By the way when I said that I deserve a treat too, I purchase a total of 4 one liters a month. I drink water from the tap and not the bottle, and I make ice tea and with store brand ice tea bags not a mix!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Some of us do have a brain in our head and know how to manage things

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • angelfromlsu's picture
    angelfromlsu
    33

    My family was also extremely poor. No home owner insurance, had termites in our raised wood house. We had a garden that I worked and we bought very simple foods. My parents refused to get food stamps and rathered us each sandwiches every night...which we did a lot with our produce.

    Only after I left for college did my dad even consider getting food stamps. I think more people should be like my dad.

    I still hold that packaged candies should not be bought with it. Just use paycheck for that. Now cereal is another matter.

    Dixieangel0722..I hope you weren't talking about me...Sorry if I upset you.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • mondaymoos's picture
    mondaymoos
    34

    While your story is tragic, dixie, I still don't see how it's right to buy soda or candy. *shrug* Yes, you deserve a treat once and a while, and I have no problem with you using that "little bit of assistance from your husband's last check" to buy that treat.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • bellaressa's picture
    bellaressa
    35

    I understand where you all are coming from but you never know what you will do until it's you. dixieangel0722, I am sorry for your families hard time. I understand, I work with families and have several that need gov assistance. I was almost homeless from a job loss one year and I was refused gov assistance since I do not have children and I had a college degree - I was told. Fresh food is expensive, buying fresh spinach, lettuce, tomatoe, and so forth only last so long. Sorry to say that yes, processed food is horrible but it last a lot longer. Also, if you are in poor area, your grocery store may not carry everything fresh and/or organic; so if you don't have a car and can't afford public transportation you are out of luck. There are also stores, I know a few in the city I live in that are basically processed food heaven, if they have anything fresh it's meat and it's usually some weeks old - yes it is also in a poor part of the city. There are people who abused the system, people who never learned how to eat and that are clueless, there are also others that are on the system that needs it. To point fingers and say this and that, is wrong but hey it's your opinion you have a right to it. You never know until you are desperate or in a situation as that.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • lula29's picture
    lula29
    37

    People are quick to point fingers at each other and ignore the high food prices caused by the policies of this current administration.

    Where are people who live in the city going to grow a garden to grow their own food? In the concrete?

    Demonizing the poor makes people feel superior because they can tell themselves they are better than the rest of them. Not true.

    As far as taxing oil revenues increasing gas prices, I say so be it. Our over dependence on oil is causing us too many problems as it is. And as it stands gas prices are rising, so why not tax the revenues?

    The days of taking advantage of cheap gas and everyone driving huge SUVs and Hummers is over. We are being forced to conserved resources and I say so be it.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • bellaressa's picture
    bellaressa
    38

    FYI: Illegal Immigrants/Undocumented people are not eligible; however, their American Children are.

    32 weeks 2 days ago Report Comment
  • minaminamina's picture
    minaminamina
    39

    My mother had to apply for food stamps when we were children, she earned $10,000/year - not enough for a family of 4. She would usually stick to the bare minimum of what we needed - we were hungry a lot, in those days the stamps didn't get you much - she tried to grow and make other things, but it was difficult with her working several jobs and trying to raise 3 children in the ghetto.

    Yeah, if she could spare it one month, she'd get us cookies or candy. We were CHILDREN - we went to school and saw what other kids had and that's when we realized we were poor. I don't think anyone who hasn't been that poor (no car, tiny flat, not enough food, not enough clothing for growing kids, etc) can possibly understand the psychological effect this had on us. My mother bought food staples like veggies and fruit because she understood nutrition - I think a lot of us here should not be surprised to realize that the poor and working-class in this country (i.e. earns less than $50,000/year for a family of 4) suffer educational inequality and segregation due to income-specific districting which is often race-specific, which means uneducated people are raising kids who cannot achieve a decent level of education. Being poorly educated means that people honestly do not know the food groups - I'm saying this because we who ARE educated assume everyone in this country knows what we consider 'the basics'. Furthermore, when you're working 2 or 3 jobs with kids in an area that is rife with crime, drugs, and the like because your low property taxes (a symptom of racism and classism that dates back to the 1950s, and continues to perpetuate racial and class stereotypes) mean your schools are overcrowded, under resources, and the bussing system in your area has been conveniently forgotten on the legal books - this is when people aren't aware that condoms should be used to protect from pregnancy and STIs, that fruits and vegetables should not come packaged or frozen, etc.

    I won't deny there are doubtlessly a minority of people out there who abuse food stamps and governmental relief programs - of course there are. But our media has been misconstruing this minority of people as representative of the MAJORITY of people on relief - we've all heard of the "welfare queen" stereotype. But we don't often hear that the majority of those on relief are white women, and we don't often study why it is that legal Latino and African American communities are over represented in the working class and poor. It isn't because anyone is lazy (this goes for all races and genders), or stupid - it is because of an ignorance that is perpetuated by our society - our society which has contained an ethno-economic system since 1776 that was solidified during the Great Depression, our society which allows segregation in schools to continue by districting and eliminating bussing systems, our society which is subject to the misconstrued and dated notions of race, class, and gender from decades prior.

    32 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • angelfromlsu's picture
    angelfromlsu
    40

    lula29 - UMMM I live in the city and still grow vegetables. I took a pot, filled it with dirt, put in seeds, and watered it....

    32 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • angelfromlsu's picture
    angelfromlsu
    41

    I also went to public school (60% black and 40% white). I am an engineer now so I think no one has excuses for poor education. I also live in Louisiana. We are 2nd worse in the nation btw. While I may be up to my neck in student loans now, I at least finished with no help from family.

    32 weeks 1 day ago Report Comment
  • lula29's picture
    lula29
    42

    angelfromlsu,

    And your little city grown garden is enough to feed a family?

    From what you said in the first place, no because your family still had to go on food stamps, so apparently your family just proved that your little windowsill g